Showing posts with label Development. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Development. Show all posts

Monday, July 18, 2011

Speeding Up The Dismantling of Toronto: CORE SERVICE REVIEWS

KPMG Core Review Moving Fast to Push Ford Ideology Over Realities

HEY TORONTO!!!! WAKE UP!!!
SOMEBODY IS DESTROYING YOUR CITY !!!

Note: All the various committee meetings are being televised live and archived on Rogers Cable 10 TV and on the net at  This Link

       HERE is a link to another blog that sums up what is happening.
...and HERE is a link to Christopher Hume's take:
"As the Core Services Sideshow grinds to its foregone conclusion, it’s clear Mayor Rob Ford is less interested in slashing costs than slashing government....His goal is less to make the city better than to make it smaller, to diminish the role it plays in our lives, whether at the park, the library, riding the subway or putting out the garbage....At the same time, Ford admits we face property tax hikes of up to 3 per cent. Never will less have cost more."

1. Public Works and Infrastructure Committee:
Meeting today (Monday July 18) as I type this.

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee's primary focus is on infrastructure, with a mandate to monitor, and make recommendations on Toronto's infrastructure needs and services.
6 Members: Denzil Minnan-Wong (Chair), Mark Grimes,  Mike Layton,  John Parker,  Gord Perks, David Shiner

 "The review, conducted by KPMG on behalf of the city, examined four core services: water, solid-waste, transportation and technical services." Weblink  "At a technical briefing (last) Monday, city manager Joe Pennachetti said the cuts could shave $10 million to $15 million from the Public Works Committee’s budget of $1.085 billion....KMPG said 96 per cent of services provided by the Public Works Committee are "core municipal services," meaning they're mandatory"

Another link to a CTV story is HERE

In essence, it seems the city is looking at incredibly ridiculous things like cutting back firefighting, EMS, water treatment, etc.

It seems there were about 26 people making deputations at today's committeee.

SUMMARY:   Said best in these Twitter Tweets...

kevinbeaulieu -Councillors Grimes, Minnan-Wong, Shiner,& Parker all vote against determining health, environmental,& service level impacts of proposed cuts

Now - Cllr Shiner moves to pass all of KPMG's "opportunities" on to the Ex Comm, basically leaving decisions up to the mayor

KEN WOOD - Gord Perk's zinger: KPMG told us amalgamation would save us money #TOCouncil #topoli  need to remember this one!

City Slikr -If PWI committee anything to go by, committees won't make any decision on KPMG report. Send decisions for mayor to make at Ex. Comm

City Slikr - Cllr Perks is suggesting results of public consultations process have been buried

Here is a link to quickie overview of the motions passed at this Public Works meeting: Torontoist
and another summary is HERE

2. Economic Development Committee:
Meets tomorrow: Tuesday, July 19 Weblink is HERE

The Economic Development Committee's primary focus is the economy, with a mandate to monitor, and make recommendations to strengthen Toronto's economy and investment climate.
6 Members: Michael Thompson (Chair), Shelley Carroll,  Josh Colle,  Sarah Doucette, Paula Fletcher, Mary Fragedakis

On the chopping block today:
* Arts Programming
* BIA Supports
* Cultural development
* Events Programming
* Heritage Supports
* Toronto Employment and Social Services
* Research and Trade Development
... Here is a LINK to Torontoist article about this.
 "Low income families, elderly, and disabled persons may be negatively impacted resulting in potentially serious health and medical issues,"

- Chair Michael Thompson gave a long-winded intro, says expect 25+ deputants, followed by chief city staffman Joe Penachetti (City Manager)... followed by self-promotional speech by KPMG... there goes about an hour.... plus questions to citymanager and others.... tic toc tic toc while deputants wait.

Today's meaningful Twitter Tweets:

Daniel Dale - I'm reminded that, in consultant-speak, "high-level," as in "high-level presentation," means "not very specific," not "very excellent."

Daniel Dale - Janet Davis to Pennachetti: have you considered anything members of the public said during consultations? (real answer is no, but avoided saying that)

Daniel Dale - KPMG reps keeps being asked about impacts of getting rid of programs and services; keep saying they weren't asked to analyze those.

by cityslikr -Just so's we're clear: this is the same KPMG that said Iceland's economy was sound, yes? We're getting them to vet our city's finances why?

Daniel Dale - 25 people signed up to speak. Six from BIAs - KPMG says city could cut staff support to them.

Daniel Dale - Del Grande says something re taxes at cte. Vaughan disagrees and comes to media area to tell us. Del Grande comes over... And says, loudly, "BULLSHIT. That's BULLSHIT." Concludes by saying, "Absolute bullshit." Vaughan starts laughing and says, "Watch your language, Mike." Chair Thompson seems to notice - Del Grande says something like, "Sorry, I just get frustrated with these people." Walks out angrily.

City Slikr - Wow. Wasn't it Cllr Del Grande complaining of the use of inappropriate language at the last council meeting?

Daniel Dale - For the record, I'm not yet sure who's right on the merits of their argument.

DoucetteWard13 - Heavy hitters from Toronto's $950 million #Film and #Television industry tell Ec Dev Cmtee - predictable services allow film & tv growth

1:35pm _ meeting supposed to resume at 1:30 but no quorum... resumed 1:37pm, people being very polite after their lunches.

... seems every BIA is making a deputation. And rightly so.

KEN WOOD - Shelley Carroll gets deputant to explain "Food Incubator" It helps local business #TOCouncil at Econ Devlt Cmttee

2:25pm end of pre-registered deputants...KEN WOOD - Very courteous chair Michael Thompson asks if anyone else not on list wants to speak Blind disabled person speaks ... cmtee takes bathroom break

* Meanwhile in other news: Goldsbie - Doug Ford complains that Toronto has too many libraries:
“We have more libraries per person than any other city in the world. I’ve got more libraries in my area than I have Tim Horton’s.”
Reality Check: •In Etobicoke (Mr. Ford’s area), there are 13 library branches there, and 39 Tim Horton’s shops, not to mention all the other donut shops. In fact, on a per capita basis, the people in Etobicoke have fewer libraries than Toronto as a whole. They have one for every 27,000 people whereas in Toronto as a whole it’s about one for every 25,000 people.
...............Mini-Mayor #2: Councillor Doug (I Hate Unions) Ford

3. Community Development and Recreation Committee :
Meets Wednesday, July 19 Weblink is HERE
.............................Com Dev & Rec Committee has 60 registerd deputations
The Community Development and Recreation Committee’s primary focus is social cohesion, with a mandate to monitor, and make recommendations to strengthen services to communities and neighbourhoods.
6 Members: Giorgio Mammoliti (Chair), Maria Augimeri, Janet Davis,  Josh Matlow,  Joe Mihevc, Kristyn Wong-Tam

Items on the chopping block here are:
* Childrens' Services = Child Care
* Long Term Care Homes
* Emergency Medical Services
* Fire Services, EMS - consider merging paramedica with fire?
* (Social) Housing, Shelters and Support
* Parks,Forestry and Recreation = higher user fees?
* Social Development = community engagement, youth services, community safety

Todays Twitter Tweets:

torontoist  -First move: committee chair Giorgio Mammoliti tries to cut off speaking list, and cut down speaking time per deputant. Both fail.

Robert Cerjanec - We have 66 deputants @ Community Develop & Rec Cmttee! Good luck

Goldsbie -From today's KPMG report: "Consider reducing or eliminating proactive inspection for illegal signs and investigation of sign complaints."

Goldsbie - From today's KPMG report: "Consider reducing or eliminating proactive inspection for illegal signs and investigation of sign complaints."

Robert Cerjanec -Some of the "opportunities" re: #TTC include scrapping night buses and privatizing routes! Shameful

Cllr Fletcher comes out swinging against KPMG b/c our cost for sports & rec services is lower than many other cities
 
Kristyn Wong-Tam - Toronto delivers recreational services most cost effectively out of 9 Ontario cities. Why privatize?
 
Cerjanec - Cllr Mammoliti tells ppl in the room that they can't use empty chairs reserved for people who aren't coming to the room!
 
  Cerjanec - Cllr Perks points out that other municipalities in Ontario provide grants for community development! Why cut it here? 

Martin Kuplens-Ewart - KPMG demonstrate lack of understanding of how TCH waitlist works, suggest doing what already happens as an efficiency

@jm_mcgrath In response to @DoucetteWard13, KPMG guy says "swimming is only a life-saving skill if you go near the water." // No! Really?

Cllr asks KPMG if they would put their children in a daycare w/ lower wages rather than higher wages. Answer: no comment.

Many questions about what was behind the KPMG report - who drives it who do they talk to about setup, etc, (Wealready Know it is Rob Ford's back room secret plam)

Daniel Dale - Deputant says he just learned he's going to be a father, Janet Davis asks him if he's on child care list yet, says he just.did it yesterday, Adam Vaughan says, "Too late." He says he's number 20,096 on the list for subsidized care.

Sue-Ann Levy - Parade of leftists and vested interests tell city ctte they are entitled to their entitlements

Goldsbie - @ @SueAnnLevy They're mostly talking about childcare, you know.

Goldsbie - Deputant, on cuts to childcare: "It's easy to steal candy from babies, but I would like the mayor to know that it's not responsible."

Maria Augimeri - When you have to apply for childcare before you're even pregnant to get any chance at a space, it makes zero sense to cut 2000 spaces

Mom @ Cttee: childcare cuts "will be met with massive protest, we simply will not accept it". With a 19,500 backlog, I don't blame moms.

'We need free -- or at least dirt cheap -- rec pgms,' deputant tells city cllrs.

Robert Cerjanec - Deputant explains why KPMG's numbers are wrong on child care subsidies.

@ddale8: Deputant says KPMG child care number is "a pile of......sorry. That is: completely wrong."

The time is 5:27PM and the all day meeting is still going on...A lot of smart women giving deputations have done their work: they point out many errors and incorrect figures in the KPMG report.

8PM - deputants finished, committee questioning chief city bureaucrat, City Manager Joe Penachetti

Daniel Dale - Mihevc: are we doing broad consultation? Pennachetti: don't have time. Mihevc: "A radical restructuring of government," we should make time.

Daniel Dale - Matlow went pretty hard at Pennachetti; asked why service review was being done hastily "and perhaps recklessly." Matlow complained that it's being done "piecemeal" - core reports to committee now, efficiency and user fee studies going elsewhere later.

Daniel Dale - Pennachetti now seems more annoyed than he's been at any meeting this year. Wong-Tam, Davis also being critical.

Daniel Dale - Davis: how do we make decisions without year-end financial results, the efficiency studies, user fee info, and knowing more about layoffs?

This committee is not willing to just roll overs and take what they are told, and are making a number of motions that require much more consultation.

8:51pm Now Josh Matlow is going on about how he would have just sent on report to the Exec, ...then  many words expressing his desire to sit on the fence. Mushy Matlow as usual.

Janet Davis - CDR defers KPMG report to Sept 14 mtg & asks for more information. Committee and Public will know then real recs from Mayor to Sept 19 Exec.
 
Official decisions made atthis meeting are HERE

4. Parks and Environment Committee:
Meets Thursday, July 21 Weblink is HERE

The Parks and Environment Committee’s primary focus is the natural environment, with a mandate to monitor, and make recommendations on the sustainable use of Toronto’s natural environment.
6 Members: Norman Kelly (Chair),  Michelle Berardinetti,  Raymond Cho, Mary-Margaret McMahon, Ron Moeser,  James Pasternak

Next on today's chopping block:

* Reduce grass-cutting, snow clearing
* Reduce tree planting, lower tree canopy targets = un-green Toronto
* Contract out park maintenance to volunteers ?
* Eliminate zoo and farm attractions eg. Riverdale Park
* Eliminate Toronto Environment Office
* Reduce maintenance of beaches
* Eliminate community gardens

"With the temperature reaching 37 C and the humidex making it feel like 51 C — Canada's largest city became Canada's hottest city, at least for one day."

Hottest day on record in Toronto, seems Mother Nature is really the first deputant to this committee...

Over 100 deputants to be heard, apparently about 392 emails sent from the general public and someone presented a petition of over 7,000 signatures. News covereage in the morning left a little early as the time used up by KPMG and visiting councillors meant the first deputant was not heard from until almost noon.

Most of the deputants were from organized lobby groups representing many more people, like Toronto Environmental Alliance, Urban Forestry, Park Peple - lots of defenders of Riverdale Farm. About 1/3 of all councillors showed up at one point or another, including ward 18's Ana Bailao.

It's a shame much of the well-researched, factual data from respected professionals did not make the news as it was a great education for anyone who listened.

Following normal Ford-bias, the committe chair limited deputants to 3 mins instead of the usual 5, and even limited councillor time to 2 mins instead of 3 to ask questions. The smart councillors tended to give their 2 mins to the more fact based deputants to finish up.

It seems the job of committee member councillors McMahon and Berardinetti was to try to ask every deputant what level of user fee they would recommend peopl pay to use parks... rather one track mind on that. Many other councillors used their question time to self promote how they love parks, no promises, but got on record they love parks.

A few tweets:

Michael Shapcott -Respect for taxpayers? Mayor Ford inherited $345.5m surplus from previous #TOCouncil - six months later, Toronto claims $774 million deficit

Michael Shapcott - On impossibly hot day, plan to cut Toronto Atmospheric Fund (which backs plans to cool urban heat effect) seems so... stupid!

Janet Davis - Kelly interrupts another young deputant who says cutting car tax was a mistake, "Do you have a car?" Then sheepishly apologizes.

torontoist - At City Hall, Parks&Rec nearing its 12th hour of mtg. Just finished defending the Toronto Environment Office: Insurance Bureau of Canada 9::25pm

by kristynwongtam - #Scarboro resident left home @7am and waited til 10 pm to tell Cmttee not to rush decisions & community gardens needed in Scarboro #parks

Parks and Environment Committee Decisions can be found HERE in its entirety.
The Parks and Environment Committee:


1. Requested the City Manager to review the List of Opportunities to ensure service efficiencies are maximized to meet the 2012 budget targets and multi-year service and financial planning objectives and report directly to the Executive Committee.

2. Requested the City Manager, in his report to the Executive Committee on September 19, 2011, to include the implications of the proposed service reductions for Parks and Environment by KPMG.

3. Requested the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to report to the September 15, 2011 meeting of the Parks and Environment Committee on how a community board governance model may be included with the Parks Plan consultation process.


5. LICENSING AND STANDARDS COMMITTEE:
Meets Monday, July 25 Weblink is HERE

The Licensing and Standards Committee's primary focus is consumer safety and protection, with a mandate to monitor, and make recommendations on the licensing of business and enforcement of property standards.
6 Members: Cesar Palacio (Chair),  Glenn De Baeremaeker, Chin Lee, Gloria Lindsay-Luby, Frances Nunziata,  Anthony Perruzza

NOTE: As of 2pm Tuesday, July 19 there are only a "handful" of deputants and this committee is not as busy as others.

The mainstream media is concentrating on the scrapping of pet licences, but the real story is much bigger. Drastic changes like getting rid of Toronto Animal Services entirely is on the table as is bylaw enforcement in a wholse host of areas. Liecnsing and Standards could even disappear potentially.

"It proposes scrapping the city’s cat and dog licensing program, outsourcing animal care and enforcement, reducing response time for emergency animal rescues and abandoning a pickup program for unwanted animals" (Globe and Mail Weblink HERE )

"Beyond the kitty and canine realm, it suggests ditching categories of business permits that “do not clearly serve a public service.” The consultants refrained from detailing all the business licences they consider to be extraneous, but the division controls a range of activities including bowling alleys, carnivals, nightclubs, tradespeople, parking lots and pet shops."

Another Toronto Star story link is over HERE
Another National Post story article is HERE
Another Toronto Sun story link is HERE

"Business licensing earns the city $6 million per year. The pet-licensing program alone brings in $660,000."
(but pet licensing costs $1.9 million to do) link ???

Today's Tweets About the Meeting:

reporterdonpeat Don Peat-by SusanGapka 19 speakers on the list for licensing and standards meeting today. So far, no dogs or cats in the room.

DoucetteWard13 Sarah Doucette - At Licensing and Standards core service meeting. Should we keep Licensing of pets so we can reunite them with their owners

DoucetteWard13 Sarah Doucette - Just watched a very disturbing video of what happened when Montreal contracted out animal services. Some residents had to leave the room

goldsbie Jonathan Goldsbie - Licensing & Standards meeting was supposed to reconvene at 1:40. Only Chair Cesar Palacio is present. He asks other councillors to show up.

goldsbie Jonathan Goldsbie - (02:35pm) (Now Nunziata and Chin Lee have arrived. Still no quorum.)

goldsbie Jonathan Goldsbie - It might be noted that Mike Layton, who showed up to this morning's Licensing Committee session, didn't return for the afternoon. (Dad has cancer, Mike was effective in the am session)

Not a tweet, but noted committee member Anthony Peruzza asked why no consideration of the taxi industry under Core Service Review.... ooops, major fail by KPMG.

News Articles:
Pet licensing reviewed - Toronto Sun "Councillors on the licensing committee voted Monday to toss suggestions for cost-savings from a core services review by KPMG to the executive committee’s September meeting"

***  Actual video footage of licensing and standards meeting is available HERE

I was there - here are my notes... 10 deputants, notable ones...

1. Peter Newell deputant spoke for the Toronto Humane Society. He acquitted himself admirably with his deputation, staying pretty general but supporting TAS staying in business: "We cannot take up the slack - If TAS vaporized it would be a challenge", TAS plays a vital role with demonstrated leadership, gave some statistics about the THS (3,000 members, 600 volunteers) and said we could work with the city to contribute meaningfully to help reduce costs at no drop in service levels, Outsourcing would be a mistake (see Ken's comments re Montreal Berger Blanc below), THS supports pet licencing and encourages microchipping, spoke about Calgary/Bill Bruce model working well (revenue neutral), gave Calgary stats: 5,000 dogs with 88% return to owners and 40% of those happen immediately upon pickup (no need for shelter... Calgary pet licencing: 80% of dogs and 50% of cats licenced withToronto at 30% dogs, 10% cats). In response to very supportive questions from committee member Glenn de Baermaeker, about microchipping said a lifetime data bank would help, present problem is people do not keep data up to date, Summary: Drastic remedies are not necessary. Glenn asked if THS or volunteers could fill in the gap if TAS were not to exists, specifically 'picking up dead animal corpses with shovels'. Peter's excellent response: No, it takes demonstrated expertise to do a lot of things TAS does as well as credibility of city run oversight, volunteers would lack the authority to do much of what TAS does.

... at least I think that is what he said, as I furiously scribbled notes. Sorry if I misquote you here Peter.

2. Ken Wood's deputation: I was the first deputant and managed to get in (in the 5 mins allowed): Pet licencing with tags is inaccurate, especially for cats who routinely lose collars, better way to go is mandatory microchipping; Said I was confused about actual costs of pet licencing as some reports say city takes in $600,000/yr but costs $1.9 million to administer - so needs looking at (apparently KPMG did not factor in that the city took in $253,000 in donations last year); Spoke well about TAS beginning to do a better and better job as they reach out to other animal welfare groups in the city and that we need them to provide a centralized, coordinating role, Mentioned that compared to city of Montreal who used to do it as city service - spent $15 million/year with 3 million pop, versus Toronto who spends $8.9 million for 2.7 million residents, so TAS is cost effective; Most of my deputation was to draw attention about disaster of Montreal's outsourcing to private, for profit Berger Blanc with terrible societal impacts and lawsuits (I provided paper copies of many links about this to the committee). In response to supportive questions from Glenn de Baermaeker, I was able to confirm: No, volunteers could not pick up the slack if TAS not there, we would see many problems, there is not enough capacity in the animal welfare community in Toronto to handle things the way they are now and it would get much worse; That I see city providing central coordinating role; eg lost /injured pets call 311 service and get connected to resources, "One Stop Shopping" as was commented by another committee member (Frances Nunziata) = a good desirable thing; That I'd like to see the city have a sort of 'shelter bed' system to direct animals in need to wherever and whomever in the city can help, whether that be humanes, shelters, rescues, fosters, etc. Many questions about microchipping, including one from chair Cesar Palacio who asked if I thought licencing compliance and revenue would be boosted if the city made it microchipping: Yes. (In fact they passed a motion on this very thing - actual motions made will be on the city website very soon as meeting ended about 3:00pm).

3. Stephanie Cliff, a vet tech who works at TAS showed a segment of the VERY disturbing expose of Berger Blanc in Montreal and ensured every committee member had a dvd of this. (I watched it last night and cried and shook with anger; many people had to leave the room and Chair Palacio actually stopped it to ensure that there were no more disturbing immages coming - the few minutes shown were NOT the worst in the 26 min+ video accessible here: Video Link   It had a major impact on the committee.

4. There were 19 pre-registered deputants on the list and only about 10 showed up. All gave really good input, including: Liz White, Animal Alliance of Canada; Nathalie Karvonen of Toronto Wildlife Centre (non profits), various current and past employees and volunteers of TAS, and Fern Sinkins formerly of Toronto Cat Rescue who gave a quickie encouraging the city to look closer at the Calgary model.plus other city workers. Several other non-committee city councillors popped in and out and seemed supportive of TAS not being cut. Darren Jackson of Toronto Civic Employees Union with 29 years' service doing animal bylaw work took particuar exception to KPMG suggestion to increase Emergency Response times to animal problems to more than 2 hours, saying when he was in North York pre-amalgamation it was 20 minutes. Michelle Firman also pointed out that the citizens of Toronto would not stand for injured animals not being cared for on the streets of our city.

RESULT: I missed some of the motions as I was in transit going home, but it seems they are NOT going to recommend outsourcing TAS, that they want to look closer at microchipping and keeping pet licencing using that leverage... This next goes to Mayor Ford's Executive committee on Thursday, July 28 (where anything can happen - but where Ford has publically invited the whole 2,503,281 of us to come get 5 mins to speak = 24 days of nonstop meeting?) - then goes to full city council for debate/decision September 21st.

                Here are the DECISIONS MADE at this meeting.

6. Government Management Committee

Meets Tuesday, July 26 Weblink is HERE

In February 2007, the General Government Committee was renamed as Government Management Committee. This committee has a focus of government assets and resources, with a mandate to monitor, and make recommendations on the administrative operations of the City.
6 Members: Paul Ainslie (Chair), Vincent Crisanti, John Filion,  Doug Ford, Pam McConnell,  Jaye Robinson

HERE is a link to story. Outsource some 311 services, consolidate finance, administrative functions

7 Deputants:

 Michael Rosenberg (a regular deputant)- speaks about waste in Information Technology (computers) - lots of new software things are "fluff" - says could save $50 million.... Doug Ford asks questions, keen on this. Deputant says lets replace computers every 6-8 years not every 4.

Miroslav Glacic talks about graffitti, problems with 311 service... Doug Ford jumps on this promoting outsource to non-union jobs, Glacic says hope it does not go to India for rock-bottom costs as we need people in Toronto who know Toronto.

????????????????????????????????????????????
CUPE union deputant reinforces that citizens will hate it if they call 311 or for helps elsewhere and end up taliking to somebody in North Dakota (as has happened)... Doug Ford attacks him on several fronts (he is so ANTI-union)... gets really nasty badgering deputant, trying to put words in his mouth. Accuses him of scare-mongering. Much revolves around issue of Ford wanting to outsource cleaning jobs at police stations (deputant rightly says thats a security risk).

Next deputant chastizes Doug Ford for his irresponsible comment about there being more public libraries in his ward than Tim Hortons (actually is 39-13 the other way) ... gets cutoff by Chair Ainslie.

*** Next deputants tell it like it is about cleaning in police facilities: feces, blood, 'manstuff', etc. Say they deserve decent benefits and fair wages, Getting $10.25/hour to clean up HIV blood?  Infection dangers like Tuberculosis? Cleaners get access to police areas even other police officers do not - it is all about trust and security. Lots of supportive (visiting) councillor questions.

Staff questions by committee members happened next. Lots of motions that pretty much went:

"All in Favour? Carried.... next (repeat)"

Adjourned at 12:49pm. Easy when everybody in the Ford camp isn't it?


Today's Tweets:

@cllrainslie is one blessed politician. Only 7 speakers at #gmcTO today (@MiroslavGlavic being one of them).

DoucetteWard13 Sarah Doucette - At Government Management Core Service meeting 7 speakers today (So is Shelley Carroll, Josh Matlow, )

shelleycarroll Shelley Carroll - WAIT! Today's Core Review stops comparing us to the 6 Cities & uses private sector only. Not what Council voted to do. #tocouncil

Josh Matlow - Interesting discussion at Government Management Committee on the possibility of using recycled aggregates on Toronto's roads.

Janet Davis - Doug Ford asks deputant if he'd be happy contracting out 311 - "don't have to worry about pensions and benefits".

Matt Elliott - Re: Contracting out 311. Is anyone actually going to argue that the private sector is good at running call centres? ... Because my experiences calling 311 are ten times better than my experiences calling Bell, Rogers, Dell, etc.

ddale8 - Speaker tells Cllr Doug Ford "cheaper isn't always better." Ford responds: "More expensive isn't always better either."

KEN WOOD - WOW Doug Ford totally loses it attacking CUPE union deputant at GovtMgt cmtee

Janet Davis - Earlier (Doug Ford?) said Toronto should look to Walmart for how the city should be run. Hmm...

City Slikr - Why would efficiency studies not go through committee process again? Am I missing something?

City Slikr - Watching Gov't Management Comm. talk about cloud based computering, I keep expecting Ted Stevens to pop in and explain it. Tubes & Wires.

...Google: Cloud computing is all the rage. "It's become the phrase du jour," says Gartner senior analyst Ben Pring, echoing many of his peers. The problem is that (as with Web 2.0) everyone seems to have a different definition   LINK  Definitions = "Cloud computing is Internet-based computing, whereby shared resources, software, and information are provided to computers and other devices on demand, like the electricity grid." "The use of a Web services such as Flickr, Google Docs, Jing (video screencapture service) to perform the functions that were traditionally done with software installed on an individual computer." "Cloud computing is the use of a 3rd party service, such as Indicee, to perform computing needs on a publicly accessible IP basis. The term cloud is used as a metaphor for the Internet" ... "Software that is provided online meaning there is no software to install or infrastructure to maintain."

City Slikr - Sorry. I don't get it. How do you outsource a city based service like 3-1-1? Won't it undercut its effectiveness slightly? (They actually talk about getting someone in Mumbai to answer questions on 311 about Toronto !!!!)

Matt Elliott - Why not just route all 311 calls to the mayor's cell phone?

Janet Davis - Gov't Man.Ctte asks for report on outsourcing 311- KPMG says "little experience" doing this. In fact, no city outsources 311 call centres

                                   DECISIONS made can be found HERE

 7. Board of Health:
Meets Tuesday, July 26 Weblink is HERE

The Board of Health determines and sets public health policy and advises City Council on a broad range of health issues. The Board of Health is composed of six Councillors, six citizen representatives and an elected school board representative.
13 Members: John Filion (Chair),  Alejandra Bravo, Eduardo Castro, Vaijayanthi Chari,  Raymond Cho, Sarah Doucette, Paula Fletcher,  Joe Mihevc,   Fiona Nelson, Lisa O'Brien,  Gord Perks,  Valerie Sterling,  Soo Wong ... Note several members are NOT city councillors. 

Today's Tweets:

Sarah Doucette - KPMG suggests eliminating the Student Nutrition program. They say this could compromise the students. I say it WOULD compromise the students

Diane_Dyson - Board of Health recommends taking provincial $$ for Bed Bug control - for inspections and extreme clean for the vulnerable

Toronto Star article HERE

Sorry - no notes. For some reason Rogers and the city are not telecasting this via the net like all the other core service review meetings.......



 8. TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD: 
Meeting at Metro Reference Library, north of Yonge and Bloor

Sorry - no notes. For some reason Rogers and the city are not telecasting this via the net like all the other core service review meetings.......

Today's Tweets:

HiMY SYeD - Standing Room only in @TorontoLibrary Board Mtg.
HiMY SYeD -Maureen o'Reilly deputing: cites number of online signatures at website.

Marcus Gee - Library union says 23,267 ppl have signed a petition against library closures.

HiMY SYeD - Maureen O'Reilly citing 1.2 Million @torontolibrary card holders... She ask @cllrainslie directly what is he doing???

HiMY SYeD - Hard to get a signal...one bar... Sorry folks, unable to live-tweet @torontolibrary board meeting

Paul Ainslie - Toronto Public Library Boartd of Directors reviewing suggestions of KPMG "Core Service Review"Shannon D'Arcy - Just got an email from @Ward18AnaBailao, who will NOT be supporting privatizing libraries.

Goldsbie - The Toronto Star provides statistics on the library that Doug Ford says "no one uses":
Link Visitors: 39,775 Active users: 2,746 Program attendance: 1,692 Annual circulation: 96,328

Ainslie - Toronto Public Library Board removes fine exemptions for Board of Directors

Janet Davis - TPL defers KPMG till Sept. 13. TP Libraries: Very busy, innovative, cost effective, exceptional customer satisfaction. Let's close them???

HiMY SYeD - Globe and Mail: #LibraryTO cuts will happen ‘in a heartbeat,’ Doug Ford says

July27:
City Slikr - Cynical me wonders if @karenstintz's strong public stand on library cuts signals that they're not really on the table...Bright sunny me hopes that 's strong public stand on library cuts signals her stepping further away from the mayor

Daniel Dale - James Pasternak told me earlier that he wouldn't support the closing of branches
              Toronto Sun: Public board shelves branch closures LINK.

hmmm, kind of looks like libraries are safe and may just be the red herring designed to draw public outrage, while sometheing bad elsewhere will happen? 

11:35am Wed July27:
Sarah Doucette - Cllr Doug Ford & I were just interviewed by Global News re closing Libraries. Gave Cllr Ford a chance to talk his foot out of his mouth



9. Planning and Growth Management Committee:
 Meets Wednesday, July 27 Weblink is HERE

The Planning and Growth Management Committee’s primary focus is on urban form, with a mandate to monitor, and make recommendations on planning, growth, and development of the City.
6 Members: Peter Milczyn (Chair), Ana Bailão,  Gary Crawford,  Frank Di Giorgio,  Karen Stintz,  Adam Vaughan

On the Chop Block:
* The Heritage Grant and Tax rebate programs could be reduced or eliminated.
* The Public Realm Improvement program could be eliminated
* Charge user fees for planning notices
* Reduce consultation in planning
* Eliminate public art program



   Today's Tweets:

(first one I've seen from him about any meeting):
Mayor Rob Ford - Planning & Growth Mgmt Cttee meeting starts in 15 minutes. Watch it live here http://t.co/WbApQNa #TOServiceReview #Toronto #FB #yyz #TOpoli

City Slikr - Cllr Fletcher to KPMG: You're speculating. KPMG: We're categorizing

cityslikr -KPMG now talking about recommendation to reduce @illegalsigns enforcement. Same not said for graffiti of course

suckersarestuck -#coreservicereview :eliminate heritage grants. Clr Vaughan announces #KPMG got big #heritage grant in Melbourne AUS to restore HQ there

.
 
... and finally .... where all the decisions seem to be made...

10.  EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE:
Meets Thursday, July 28 Weblink is
HERE

The Executive Committee makes recommendations on Council's strategic policy and priorities, governance policy and structure, financial planning and budgeting, fiscal policy including revenue and tax policies, intergovernmental and international relations, Council and its operations, and human resources and labour relations.
13 Members: Mayor Rob Ford, Mike Del Grande, Paul Ainslie,  Michelle Berardinetti, Doug Holyday, Norm Kelly,  Giorgio Mammoliti, Peter Milczyn,  Denzil Minnan-Wong,  Cesar Palacio, Jaye Robinson, David Shiner,  Michael Thompson

* Mayor Ford invites residents to tell him what to keep, cut    LINK HERE
...
So, Y'all Come On Down to Mayor Rob's Place and Tell Us Whatcha Thinkin', Toronto
I guarantee each of you get your 5 minutes to speak, all 2,503,281 of you
Just call, write, email or fax to:
Frances Pritchard

10th floor, West Tower, City Hall
100 Queen Street West
Toronto, ON M5H 2N2
email: 
exc@toronto.ca
phone: 416-392-6627
fax: 416-392-1879

... Tweet: as of noon, Wed July 27: Kim Wright - Must rest up tonight. There are already 210 deps registered for Exec Cmte tomorrow. May bump into sundown clause on Friday.

Toronto Star article about this:
http://www.thestar.com/news/torontocouncil/article/1033078--shrinking-government-not-deficit-drives-ford
"For Mayor Rob Ford, no matter what he says, this painful budget exercise is not about slaying Toronto’s annual deficit....In carefully chosen words before the start of Thursday’s epic executive meeting, Ford decreed that “must have” services stay and the “nice to haves” go. In his mind-the-shop view, cities don’t hand out arts grants, bolster poor student’s meals, spur environmental research or own a zoo."

"The public consultation process that included deputations to the executive committee is an elaborate sham, something apparent to most of the long line of Torontonians who passionately pleaded for Ford to keep his election promise not to reduce services."














Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Planning for a New Toronto

Toronto Has Planning?
Link to City Website About Official Plan

"Toronto’s official plan is up for a mandated review in 2011, but it’s not yet clear whether the city plans to tweak the five-year-old document or pursue major changes....Some planning experts feel council should ditch the official plan and radically recast Toronto’s approach to growth. John Van Nostrand, founding principal with planning Alliance, says some of the world’s leading cities have abandoned “aspirational” OPs in favour of long-term strategic plans that identify major urban goals and lay out plans for achieving them."(Globe and Mail article from Feb 4:  What's Up With Toronto's Official Plan? )

Ford's Critical 100 Year Decisions Toronto Star article by Paul Bedford, former City of Toronto Chief Planner "Is progressive city planning possible under Mayor Rob Ford and the current Toronto City Council?"..."After decades of inaction, Toronto urgently needs to get on with building transit of all types. Ford and the new council will be making 100-year decisions that will shape our future. Now is not the time to get cynical; the future success of Toronto and the region is far too important."

More Gridlock ?
Census Move Hurts Toronto Planning (CBC) talks about how federal moves to kill long form census affects local urban planning. There are numerous tools available to planners now, thanks to technology, like satellite images from space that give instant up to the minute maps with great detail. That should mean planning would benefit. BUT - the biggest obstacle to good, sensible planning is still PEOPLE.: Political partisanship, short term focus, turf wars, personality conflicts.

What is needed from this current Toronto City Council is VISION and COOPERATION. The things that individual councillors decide today will affect us for generations to come. Particularly in the area of TRANSIT, this is a watershed moment in the life of our city. We desperately need calm, cool and logical discussions and debates. At least locally,  the election campaign is over and the time for blame game rhetoric is over.

Let's hope City Council takes this message to heart when discussing long term planning. Because...
. Toronto Deserves Better from its political leaders.


DEVELOPMENTS:

* Update: Ryerson Wants Developer to Join Project Yonge-Dundas-Gerrard "...steering clear of an ambitious effort by the local councillor (Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam ) to create a high-minded plan for a rundown retail strip where fire destroyed a landmark heritage building last month."

* Update: Is Dundas West Ready for Eight Stories?  "Maple Leaf Lumber, at Dundas and Manning Avenue have applied to the City of Toronto to rezone the site, knock down the venerable building supply yard and put up a 98-unit, eight-storey condo tower, with eight four-storey townhouses on the back end where the lumber warehouse now stands. The building would have 62 underground parking spots. A preliminary report on the rezoning comes to Toronto and East York Community Council on Wednesday."

* Update: The Bloordale Pantry in Ward 18 at Lansdowne and Bloor at 1285 Bloor Street West used to be an establishment with a very long history that provided low cost meals for low income people and a place for them to gether an talk. It has now been successfully "GENTRIFIED"  Now when you go there, you'll see it is very upscale with trendy youth filling the place for creative dishes and yuppie talk. No more 'smelly old low income people' (see the link for the rabid comments about how most people think its a good thing those types have been forced out). Here is a BlogTO article about the place.

Gentrification and urban gentrification are terms referring to the socio-cultural displacement that results when wealthier people acquire property in low income and working class communities. Consequent to gentrification, the average income increases and average family size decreases in the community, which sometimes results in the eviction of lower-income residents because of increased rents, house prices, and property taxes. This type of population change reduces industrial land use when it is redeveloped for commerce and housing. In addition, new businesses, catering to a more affluent base of consumers, tend to move into formerly blighted areas, further increasing the appeal to more affluent migrants and decreasing the accessibility to less wealthy natives. (Source: Wikipedia )

Question: Should urban city official planning take into account poor people, or is it all about creating a rich environment that caters only to those that have money?

* Update Feb 16: Rob Ford Pitches Private Financing Plan for Sheppard Subway Expansion "Mr. Ford’s staff submitted the proposal to the regional transportation authority, Metrolinx, on Tuesday as part of ongoing efforts to craft a successor to Transit City, the light-rail network Mr. Ford declared “over” the day he took office." Estimate: $3.6 billion versus the Sheppard Transit City LRT $1.1 billion

* Update: Feb 17 Councillors Approve Controversial Ravine Development "A plea by Bussin’s successor — Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon — to have the city oppose the development of a six-storey Kingston Rd. condo building — located on the Glen Davis Ravine — was shot down 6-5....Councillor Gord Perks, chair of the community council, said the city would get the “best outcome” on the issue if city legal and planning officials went to the OMB in support of the development — as they’d recommended — along with a list of 43 conditions that must be met to significantly improve the building....Councillor Janet Davis agreed with Perks, saying the property owner has a “right to develop the site and it is going to be developed.”

THE CONDOMIZATION OF TORONTO ?

* Update: Feb 17 Eye Weekly Hyping Condominiums in Toronto "Some 18,000 new condominium units were completed in the Greater Toronto Area last year, according to the market research firm Urbanation. Another 17,000 will pop up this year, and 20,000 will rise next year—meaning Toronto will have more condo units for sale than any other city on the continent"... Condominiums are most often marketted as the exclusive purview of the "Discriminating Few", for those with the right 'Lifestyle', glamorous and 'Exclusive'. In Mayor Rob Ford's Toronto business, they love that you can cram as many taxpayers vertically as possible.

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Affordable Housing Committee

AFFORDABLE HOUSING -
  Definitely NOT There Yet

Chair:          Ana Bailao, ward18 Davenport
Vice-Chair:  Mark Grimes,  ward6 Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Members:
- Maria Augimeri, ward9 York Centre
- Michelle Berardinetti, ward35 Scarborough Southwest
- Vincent Crisanti, ward1 Etobicoke North
- Joe Mihevc, ward 21 St. Paul's

The Affordable Housing Committee oversees the activities of the Affordable Housing Office. These activities include directing federal and provincial government investments in new affordable rental and ownership housing in partnership with private and non-profit developers. They also include delivering federal funds to repair and modify the homes of low-and-modest income seniors, disabled persons and families. The committee also facilitates the implementation of Housing Opportunities Toronto, the City's 10-year affordable housing action plan.     Weblink for more info, schedules, etc   

Weblink to overview briefing given at Feb 2, 2011 meeting.

Briefing Highlights:

23% or 216,070 households live in housing that is too small, in need of repairs or is too expensive
* 45% of residents rent. Much of Toronto's rental housing is aging and needs repair. 
* Vacancy rates have dropped from 3.1% to 2.2% since last year, meaning 5,532 apartments out of 254,555 were vacant
* Average rents for a bachelor, one-, two-and three bedroom apartments are $ 778, $ 950, $ 1135 and $ 1346
* There are currently 76,549 households on the wait list for subsidized housing.  In Toronto, there are 99,047 social housing units

* Population Projections: Increase from 2.6 to 2.9 million people by 2020 with more seniors (103,120), children (39,870) and working-age people (122,580).

* Related Story: Data Bank a One Stop Trove of GTA, Regional Housing Stats brings together up-to-date statistics regarding housing, poverty and population trends...The data are compiled from Statistics Canada information, municipal data and reports from the non-profit and development sectors, and provide a comprehensive picture of housing needs in the City of Toronto as well as the surrounding regions of Halton, Durham, Peel, and York...“There isn’t an area in Toronto that doesn’t have the need for more affordable housing.” ...Some other info:

* By 2036, the region's population is expected to grow to 9.1 million (over half of Ontario's population) and be home to an increasing number of seniors, new immigrants, young families and working-age people.
* Toronto's Street Needs Assessment 2009 estimated there were 5,086 homeless people in the City on April; 
* Food banks served an average of 85,881 people per month in 2009...Housing is the largest expense for most people who use food banks. Some clients are paying up to 68% of income on shelter...
almost one in five households (322,415) continue to struggle with finding and keeping an affordable home
* In 2006, some 26% of owners and 46% of renters were spending 30% or more of their income on shelter.
---

Greater Toronto Summit meeting will be held in Toronto next week,  Feb. 10 and 11, "a gathering of some of the city’s top thinkers and most influential figures. Weblink info

---

There is STILL no National Housing Strategy for Canada at the federal level.

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Hey Ana Bailao - Take Note

Recurring Issues and Ramping Up for Change?

* PEDESTRIAN SAFETY: We should all be disturbed that being a pedestrian in Toronto can be a dangereous - and increasingly so - activity. SIXTEEN Pedestrians Hit Over Two Days - One of Them KILLED: http://www.cp24.com/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20101118/101118_hit?hub=CP24Home That pedestrian killed was a 50 year old woman at Dundas and Dupont ( http://www.insidetoronto.com/news/local/article/905077--pedestrian-struck-killed-near-dundas-and-dupont ). It angers me that every time the media report on this, the message seems to be blaming the pedestrian, not the rushing drivers that hit them. In a related Spacing story, the often quoted Sgt. Tim Burrow comments that the media are the ones that seem to blame pedestrians, not the police: http://spacingtoronto.ca/2010/11/19/sharing-responsibility-for-pedestrian-safety/ In a big city increasingly becoming car-centric and cyclist/pedestrian unfriendly, I fear things will get much worse. Despite having a 'Pedestrian Charter' and some inroads on building a sensible cucling structure, we now have to deal with the Ford agenda. Who will stand up for the people in ward 18, many of whom are like the rest of the city aging and slowing down ?

* METROLINX- ELECTRIC TRAINS ? Yes this is still an ongoing fight. It seems everyone does NOT want polutting diesel trains running through our ward (and others), yet it is still being rammed down our throats by the non-elected entity. http://www.junctiontriangle.ca/node/915#comment-2767 My fervent hope is that Ana doesn't take the expedient political manoeuver of saying - 'oh that's a provincial issue'... kind of hard when she is a Liberal and it is the Dalton McGuinty driven initiative at its core. I actually know of a resident who is considering moving away because of this. I suspect there are more. How exactly will Ana stand up for the people of ward 18 in this matter? (Better than the non-entity Tony Ruprecht, I hope)

* DAYCARE DILEMMA: Yes,. I know it's across the street from ward 18, but the city-run Dovercourt Child Care Centre just north of College Street gave notice it is quite suddenly closing in just 6 weeks. http://www.parentcentral.ca/parent/education/article/895033--toronto-parents-angered-by-closing-of-city-run-daycare We all know that most families have two parents working to be able to afford living in the city, so this is an unacceptable hardship and a step backward for Toronto. In the past we've seen closings of daycars the other direction for ward 18 near High Park (unbelievable community complaints there were 'too many' daycares on the street). This needs to be dealt with FAST by incoming council. There is a great fear that the Rob Ford administration in its crusade against "the gravy train" will cut many city services... What will Ana Bailao do?

* VOICE OF RESIDENTS: Ana Bailao during the election campaign, like everyone else running, said that community-councillor relations and representing the voice of the ward to city hall (and not vice-versa) was a priority issue and promise. (Reconfirmed in today's Toronto Star article http://www.thestar.com/news/torontocouncil/article/895074--city-hall-rookies-2010-ana-bail-o ). Ana "plans to launch a community advisory board made up of residents who have a mix of ideas and a mix of experience, including local business people, planners and environmentalists". This was said in relation to local residents having a say in future development in ward 18 - but I hope she expands it to become an advisory panel on other issues, not just development. If there was one key thing that the people are looking for to be different in the ward, it is to be the exact opposite of Adam Giambrone when it comes to timely consultation with ALL the ward and allowing input to inform actions at council.

* Some recommendations for her 'Community Advisory Board": Frank de Jong (environmentalist); Please NOT Spiro Koumoudouros - Bloordale BIA and strip club owner (He is simply speculating on tons of properties in Bloor Lansdowne area); I don't klnow exactly who, but it would be nice to reach out to the NDPers... Kevin Beaulieu? ... at least, I hope all members live in the ward or have an active interest in it. What about Hema Vyas as someone who knows multiple cultural interests? And just what sort of mix of ideas is Ana looking for? Doug Carroll had some interesting things to say about city governance. There have also been many engaged people in the ward, like: Dyan Marie, Jack Fava, Sam Galati, Steve Barbosa, Kirk Russell, (and me)..... AND what about HIMY SYED who ran for mayor, is a Muslim, lives in the near area and is the most civic engaged person I have ever met with tons of knowledge and wisdom? How will she put such minds to work?

* DUNDAS PARKING RESTORATION: Again quoted in the above referenced Toronto Star article, Ana says that's the first thing she'll do on council. It shouldn't be hard, given Rob Ford's love affair with anything that involves individual motor vehicles. Yet, it is a double edged sword, since TRANSIT (TTC) is also an important issue for most of the ward. 41% of the work trips in ward 18 are by transit - an often reported statistic in profiles of the ward: http://torontoist.com/politics/ward18.php As well. pretty much all of the runnbers up in the election were in favour of 'Complete Streets' where we give equal weight to the needs of pedestrians, cyclists, cars, transit, seniors, disabled, etc. How will Ana handle the TTC issues at council?

* POVERTY: In an article from the Hamilton Spectator about provincial (non) reponse to poverty issues, they said: " The City of Hamilton is tied with TORONTO for the highest poverty rate in Ontario, at 20 PER CENT of its population " Source: http://www.thespec.com/news/local/article/277949--ten-things-queen-s-park-needs-to-know-about-hamilton-s-demographics Now whther that is accurate or not, we know that ONE THIRD of ward 18 residents live on less than $30,000 a year in our very expensive Toronto - and that many live below the poverty line on less than $12,000 a year. All you have to do to see the need is visit a Food Bank or see tha constant dire warnings that demand is outpacing supply. HUNGER, HOMELESSNESS, POVERTY, WORKING POOR do exist in ward 18, Ana. Despite the ongoing gentrification of our area and the rise of upscale yuppie-artsie boutiques and eateries, there is still those left behind. What will Ana do to respond to this?

* CONSTITUENCY OFFICE: So, I am wondering where Ana will locate her ward constituency office - if she has one. There is no requirement for councillors to do this, and in today's The Star article she says she "will hold weekly open office hours at community centres across the ward". Not a bad idea if she can do it and it is well publicized and equally rotating. I actually favour heving city-owned lodgings located in a central geographic area of the ward that is wheelchair/disabled accessible and close to public transit. (This stops politicians from favouring one part of the ward over another). But... rotating is good if equitably done.

Davenport Deserved Better - Did We Get It?
The NEW City Council meets December 6-7.
We shall see... If We Watch....

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

THE ROGERS LIVE WARD 18 TV DEBATE

SOME REVELATIONS, PROMISES AND FIREWORKS

Of the 12 registered candidates, the following 9 showed up for the 8PM Wed Sept 29 debate:

Bailao, Ana
Beaulieu, Kevin
Carroll, Doug
de Jong, Frank
Le, Nha
MacDonald, Joe
Russell, Kirk
Vyas, Hema
Wood, Ken

Elmi, Abdirazak and Muhit, Mohammed and Teliatnik, Joanna did not attend.

Being given only 90 seconds for an introduction and 30 seconds for a close makes it pretty hard for a candidate to get all their platform in - but most did an admirable job.

Dale Goldhawk, the moderator, was his usual affable self - yet kept everyone on point.

Call in questions were about:


  • Lack of consultation in the ward by 'soon-to-be-former' incumbent Adam Giambrone, who was criticized for poor judgement and his related effect on his former campaign manager, executive assistant and current candidate Kevin Beaulieu. Some real fireworks here - and a coincidence? *

  • Ana Bailao's ties to the developers and support from outside the ward plus a demand for her to reveal donor list one week before the election was extended by Mr Goldhawk to everyone who promised a big unanimous YES.

  • What will candidates do about development in the ward, Dundas West parking mentioned

  • Who do each of the candidates support for Mayor. 4 answered Joe Pantalone, many avoided answering and I (Ken Wood) promised to post it on my ward18.ca website one week before the election. As Dale noted, it was a fair question for voters to ask.

In responding to questions, Joe MacDonald managed to do a bit of a pitbull attack on at least three competitors: Ana Bailao, Kevin Beaulieu and Hema Vyas for their ties to parties and the mistakes of the past, and for shopping around for a ward to run in (Hema lives in ward14 he pointed out).

I hope a lot of ward 18 voters tuned in because it was a great (if too short) one stop shopping for city councillor. Weblink for the show: http://www.rogerstv.com/page.aspx?lid=12&rid=16&sid=3614&dat=9/29/2010 If you are a Rogers subscriber you can see it online.

I may post more as I remember it and hope someone has live-streamed it or taped it)


* Coincidentally (Adam) Giambrone criticized for $15,000 TTC Promo Video as waste of taxpayers' money for self-aggrandizing: http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/ttc/article/868219--giambrone-criticized-for-15-000-ttc-promo-video Video is here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1emO_zZTHAk This is the Toronto Sun article:

This raise two important questions:

1. "The $15,000 for the report and video - which was written with TTC staff input but generated by the chairman's office (Giambrone) - will come out of "various councillors' budgets" ? ... Which councillors? - the left wing Millerites? Why should it be out of councillors' local ward budgets? And why DOES this out of the ordinary report prominently figure Mr. Giambrone? - building name recognition for what?

2. "The councillor ... brushed off suggestions he was fact-checking the current mayoral candidates"... What give Mr Giambrone the right to in my view so blatantly campaign for Mr Pantalone's view of the TTC using city taxpayers' money?

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

DEVELOPMENT in Ward 18

DEVELOPMENT - What does it really mean for residents?

Sitting in a Tim's coffee shop the other day, I got into a discussion of what the often mentioned topic of "Development" at debates really means, and how do we put it in words that really mean something to both voters who want to know what the real results will be and candidates who try to communicate platforms in a few punchy words that grab attention.

I realized many of us do not have the same understanding and it is one of those topics that sounds important and is a 'good' thing, but can be really messed up in practice.

So, being an internet type, I googled it:

Development: noun, 1. A significant event, occurence or change; 2. A fact, event or happening, especially one that changes a situation; 3. Act of improving by expanding or enlarging or refining; 4. A process in which something passes by degrees to a different stage, especially to a more mature or advanced stage.

SUSTAINABLE Development: meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. (In other words, don't screw up the future for our children)

While searching, I also came across this little tidbit from the last City Councillor election campaign from November 4, 2006 by Matthew Blackett of Spacing: http://spacing.ca/votes/2006/11/04/giambrone-attacked-in-poster-campaign/ It talks about Adam Giambrone's then campaign manager, Kevin Beaulieu responding to this poster from an irate business owner and shows how angry businesses can get at city interference...
Another candidate for councillor in this year's election, Ana Bailao, is the subject of some controversy as in the 2003 election, only 7 of her campaign donors lived in the ward and most of them from outside were in the construction and development industry( http://www.blogto.com/city/2010/08/drinks_with_the_candidates_for_ward_18/ )

All of this begs the question:

Just what do candidates mean when they talk of development ?

Since I can only speak for myself, here is what I mean:

* Development WILL happen. It is a given. Change is what we do in our lives and in city building.

* Whether it is GOOD development or BAD development can only be decided upon by the people who have to live with that change. No expert planner, bureaucrat, politician or self-styled visionary can accurately decide what is good for others. People with lived experience outside our neighbourhoods cannot possibly know what is needed or wanted, and often can do more damage than good. This is why it is essential that early consultation happen - residents and business owners are told what is possibly going to happen, and then are given an opportunity to have significant input.

* This means the process must always include people in the area affected by the change.

In my view the kinds of development needed in ward 18 includes:

1. Maximizing the use of dormant lands and properties, like this one:













1006 College at Havelock
Abandoned since before 2003 -Yet we still have affordable housing issues and homelessness?
There are many more examples. Empty lots, land being slowwwwwly reclaimed from toxic conditions.

2. Small Business Renewal: There are sections within the ward that have been neglected for far too long. Some areas have BIA's that represent members well and are heard, others have sometimes been ignored (eg. Dundas BIA and parking). Some areas like right along College from the Dundas crossoverto Dufferin are in shoddy shape (no BIA there). We still see too many emty storefronts and they can't all be art galleries. People live in the area and need restaurants, support services and supply stores. That there are a lot of thrift stores and pawn shops speaks to the degree of low incomers and poverty in the area. Yet I worry about poor planning around GENTRIFICATION... another set of definitions:

to GENTRIFY - means making a neighbourhood conform to middle class aspirations; usually increases income for developers while decreasing family, culture and evicting low income groups; it raises the status of some at the expense of others; often starts with artists, ends with speculating developers.

3. We need to CONTROL development: This is the job of city and neighbourhood builders, which includes key roles of elected City Councillors and the Mayor. But these roles must only be the facilitators. Decisions on development directions must come from residents and business owners in the area. City bureaucrats whould contribute to the process, but not in any way direct or lead it.

These are my thoughts on DEVELOPMENT... something we should all be involved in because...
DAVENPORT DESERVES BETTER !